Legal Opinion
Nhem v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided June 4, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sherman, RJ.
This is a G.L.c. 90, §34M action to recover $11.00 in Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits allegedly owed by defendant Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”) to its insured, plaintiff Ying Nhem (“Nhem”). After trial, judgment was entered for Metropolitan, and Nhem filed this Dist./Mun. Cts. RAD.A, Rule 8C appeal.
The record indicates that Nhem was injured in a motor vehicle accident on September 29, 1993, and was treated by chiropractor George F. Donahue for five months thereafter. On May 9, 1994, Metropolitan received Nhem’s PIP benefits…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. GersteinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Creswell v. Medical West Community Health Plan, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Flanagan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Sullivan v. First Massachusetts Financial Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Town of Sturbridge v. McDowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ny v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- Salafia v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- Salafia v. Trust InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Fabian v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
- Hale v. Building 19⅙Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.