Legal Opinion

People v. Martinez

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 2004No. 3-02-0382PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

Defendant was charged with two counts of murder. At trial, he was forced to wear an electronic stun belt. He objected and asked the court to have the belt removed. The court refused, but failed to make findings supporting its decision as required by People v. Boose, 66 Ill. 2d 261 (1977). We reverse, finding that the court’s failure to consider the Boose requirements amounted to a denial of defendant’s due process rights.

Defendant, Rene Martinez, was charged with two counts of murder. Pursuant to the Will County sheriffs “standard operating procedure,” he was forced to wear an electronic stun…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. BussIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. BooseIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. People v. StaleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In re Jonathon C.B.Illinois Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. DuPreeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. State v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API