Legal Opinion

State v. Bates

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 2005No. 02C43419; A121757PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for supplying contraband. ORS 162.185. His sole assignment of error asserts that, by requiring him to wear a “stun belt,” the trial court violated his constitutional right to be free from physical restraints during his trial. We affirm.

The incident from which the charge of supplying contraband arose occurred while defendant was serving two life sentences at the Oregon State Penitentiary. Concerned about courtroom security, the trial court gave defendant the option of wearing either shackles or a stun belt while in the court room. Defendant refused to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Wrinkles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brandon Mobley v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Sproule v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API