Legal Opinion

Meyberg v. Kauffman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1944No. Civ. 14360PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal from an order settling certain accounts after hearing on appellant’s objections. The primary basis of the motion is the claim that the court had, some two months prior to the entry of the judgment appealed from, made a final order from which the contestant had taken an appeal, thereby conferring jurisdiction upon the Supreme Court.

Respondent is the administrator with will annexed of the respective estates of his parents, Clemence and Leon Kauffman. In due course of administration he filed his first and second accounts in the estate of Clemence and his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re Estate of LevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Queen v. QueenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. In Re Estate of McPheeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Estate of YaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Estate of TolerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Kauffman v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  4. Estate of JoslynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Estate of MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API