Legal Opinion

Queen v. Queen

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1941No. Civ. 11478PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in the sum of $4,800, together with interest, $500 counsel fees, costs and disbursements. The action arose in connection with an unpaid balance due plaintiff under a property settlement agreement in which defendant obligated himself to pay her the sum of $150 a month until a total of $9,000 had been paid.

Plaintiff and defendant married on September 6, 1916; they separated on November 2, 1931. Thereafter, on January 7, 1932, a written property settlement agreement as above mentioned was entered into between them, following which plaintiff filed a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Howard v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Moss v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hill v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Rhodes v. RhodesAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API