Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 24, 1948No. 6 Div. 643PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Justice.
This is an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act by Mrs. Marie Reynolds, who sues as the administratrix of the estate of her husband Hury O. Reynolds, deceased, against the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company to recover damages for his death. 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.
The complaint as originally filed and as subsequently amended consisted of twelve counts. Under Rule 28 of this Court, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, however, the record has been abridged, and for the purposes of this appeal the complaint consists only of counts 10, 11 and 12.
Defendant’s amended…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Morgan Yawn, Jr. v. Southern Railway Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Reynolds v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Louisville & N. R. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. YoungerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Ellerbee v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.