Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 14, 1949No. 234PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner brought this suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act in an Alabama state court. As permitted by the practice in that state, all the facts which the petitioner expected to prove to establish her cause of action were set forth in the complaint so that any objections to a verdict in her favor based on evidence of those facts could be disposed of prior to trial. The respondent demurred to the complaint on the ground that the facts as thus set forth did not constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained by the trial court and its action was affirmed by the Supreme…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Lillie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Anderson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Reynolds v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Brown v. Western R. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Korte v. New York, N. H. & H. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Emmett E. Page v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Chapman v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Gill v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API