Legal Opinion

American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Harlan-Elzey-Randall Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1929No. 1230-5255PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

This is a “county court case,” whose nature is fully disclosed in the majority and dissenting opinions in the Court of Civil Appeals. 7 S.W.(2d) 132. '

The exceptional conditions of jurisdiction in the Supreme Court (see article 1821, R. S. 1925) presented in the petition in error, are conflict of decision, in the present case and in cases cited herein below, and construction of a statute; i. e., article 1844, R. S. 1925.

Seasonably Harlan-Elzey-Randall Company prepared and requested submission of instruction of verdict. The request was overruled. •This action of the trial court was not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garitty v. RaineyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BoolesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Marshburn v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Marshburn v. StewartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Layton v. HightowerTexas Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stillman v. HirschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Kennedy v. McMullenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API