Legal Opinion

Garitty v. Rainey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1923No. 3725PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This is an original proceeding for mandamus, to require the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District to certify to this Court certain questions determined by them in the case of James Garitty et al. v. J. L. Holbert, Mayor, et al. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, containing a full statement of the case, is reported in 235 S. W., 231. The relators here were plaintiffs in the trial court and appellants in the Court of Civil Appeals. The suit is the contest of an election, and the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is final. Revised Statutes, Article 1591.

On December 11, 1917,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wolf v. BrassTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. City of El Paso v. RuckmanTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. City of Fort Worth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Werner v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. City of Rockdale v. CuretonTexas Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Bybee v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Rogers v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dixon v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hopkins v. First National Bank at BrownsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Parker v. BaileyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API