Legal Opinion

Stillman v. Hirsch

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1936No. 6975PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp

This case involves important procedural questions with respect to statutes and rules relating to filing motions for new trial, including the action of the trial judge in giving, refusing, or qualifying instructions to the jury, and the filing of assignments of error, as may be considered prerequisite to appellate review by the courts.

The Honorable Court of Civil Appeals held: (1) That motions for new trial shall be filed in the trial court, and that such motions shall be in writing and specify each ground on which it is founded, and that no error not specified shall be considered (unless…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Craver v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BoolesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Egan v. Lockney Farmers' Co-op. Soc.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BeasleyTexas Supreme Court · 1913

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In the Interest of M.N.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Rowan v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. T. N. O. R. R. Co. v. McGinnisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Southern Underwriters v. SamanieTexas Supreme Court · 1941

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API