Woodward v. Tyng & Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Harlan, C. J.) The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Court in a former appeal of the same ease in Tyng and Company v. Woodward, 121 Md. 422. The following are the prayers of the plaintiff and defendant, with the action of the Court upon each: Plaintiffs First Prayer — The plaintiff prays the Court to instruct the jury that if they find that the defendant offered the plaintiff $400 per share for fifty (50) shares of said stock…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Harlan, C. J.) The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Court in a former appeal of the same ease in Tyng and Company v. Woodward, 121 Md. 422. The following are the prayers of the plaintiff and defendant, with the action of the Court upon each: Plaintiffs First Prayer — The plaintiff prays the Court to instruct the jury that if they find that the defendant offered the plaintiff $400 per share for fifty (50) shares of said stock and if they find that -the plaintiff accepted said offer and notified the defendant of its acceptance before receiving…
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
The facts, and legal principles involved in this litigation were so fully and clearly set out in the opinion prepared by Ohieb Judge Boyd, when this case was first before this Court (121 Md. 422), that a restatement of them would serve no useful purpose. It will be sufficient to note any variation in the evidence adduced in the present record, from that which appeared in the first appeal, and certain rulings of the Court as to evidence and upon prayers, which were not previously presented.
This record contains nineteen bills of exception, but at the argument the 1st, 5th, 6th, 7th, 16th, 17th…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Puterbaugh v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Brownlee v. BoltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Mendel v. Miller & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Regester v. RegesterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kaline v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Wilmer v. PlacideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Frederick v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- Trautman v. SchroederMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matthews v. J. B. Colt Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.