Legal Opinion

Brownlee v. Bolton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1880PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Alpena. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The parties contracted as in the margin* con-*219corning the sale of cedar posts and telegraph poles and on ocd&sion of the first shipments Bolton and McRae caused the posts to be inspected by a disinterested person as they were put on board. But Brownlee claimed that their agreement with the contract must be settled by inspection at the place or places of destination, and he threw out a large number as culls, and made a charge for their handling and dock-age. Bolton and McRae asserted that the place of shipment was the place of acceptance, and that they would not submit to have the inspecting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cahen v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Cherry Valley Iron Works v. Florence Iron River Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  3. T. B. Scott Lumber Co. v. Hafner-Lothman Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Gaines Bros. & Co. v. Citizens' Bank of HenryettaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Penn v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API