Legal Opinion

Frederick v. American Sugar Refining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1922No. 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; John C. Rose, Judge. Action at law by the American Sugar Refining Company against William C. Frederick. Trial to court Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WADDILL, Circuit Judge.

On the 28th day of May, 1920, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, purchased from the defendant in error, hereinafter called the plaintiff, 300 barrels of sugar, covered by two separate orders of 150 barrels, each barrel to contain 350 pounds more or less refined granulated sugar, at $22.50 per 100 pounds, f. o. b. New York, the first order of 150 barrels to he delivered in the month of July, 1920, or as soon thereafter as possible, and the second order of 150 barrels, in the month of August, 1920, or as soon thereafter as possible. The defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Urbansky v. KutinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. Regester v. RegesterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  3. Young v. MertensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  4. Woodward v. Tyng & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Anderson-Thompson, Inc. v. Logan Grain CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. EgertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
  4. Garcia & Maggini Co. v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  5. Luray Supply Co. v. Franklin Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API