Legal Opinion

Hauk v. Van Ingen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 1, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Creditor’s Bill. — Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Donne, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1900.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

This was a creditor’s bill based upon a judgment for $2,254.90 recovered by the complainants against Columbus B. Hauk. The bill having been answered the cause was referred to a master to take testimony and report. The master in his report, from the evidence, finds that Joanna i\T. Hauk acquired, in 1858, by the will of her father, two lots in George street, Cincinnati, Ohio; that these lots were sold, one in 1864 and the other in 1865, for a total sum of $6,400; that this sum, together with about $11,600 belonging to Columbus B. Hauk, was invested in the purchase of a farm at South…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Wetherell v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Dillman v. NadelhofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Keady v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Hughes v. NoyesIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldberg v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API