Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Noyes

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1898PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

A proceeding in equity, in the nature of a creditor’s bill, was begun in Clark county, by appellant, to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance of real estate, being the separate property of Reuhamia Noyes, made by her and Gilman Noyes, her husband, to their son, Frank G. Noyes, all of whom were made defendants to the bill, and to subject said property to the payment of a certain judgment obtained by appellant against Gilman and Reuhamia Noyes. The evidence was taken before the master, who reported it to the court, with his findings, in favor of complainant, but the chancellor set aside…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newman v. WillettsIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Weightman v. HatchIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Romans v. MadduxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Higgins v. HigginsIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. McKey v. McKeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hauk v. VanIngenIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Luthy & Co. v. ParadisIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Reisch v. BowieIllinois Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API