Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 26, 2010No. 97,013PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beier, J.:

This is a direct appeal from defendant Mary Ann

Wright’s conviction of rape. Wright argues that there was insufficient evidence to convict her of rape by force or fear and that the district court erred in admitting evidence under K.S.A. 60-455.

Factual and Procedural Background

Wright provided massages out of her home. She was primarily self-taught, learning with the aid of books and videos from the library. Wright’s clients included J.L., age 21.

On the day the rape allegation arose, J.L. arrived at Wright’s home for a massage. Wright asked J.L.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. State v. TimleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. State v. GrissomSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. Rojas-MarcelenoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. State v. BerriozabalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API