Legal Opinion

State v. Berriozabal

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 2010No. 100,291PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

Appealing from jury convictions of one count of rape, one count of attempted rape, and two counts of aggravated criminal sodomy, Jesus Berriozabal argues his convictions should be reversed because the district court erred by admitting evidence of prior uncharged sexual conduct between Berriozabal and the complaining witness, by denying his motion for a psychological examination of the complaining witness, and by excluding evidence that the complaining witness had been sexually abused by a relative. In addition, he argues his two hard 25…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. Rojas-MarcelenoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. RaskieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. StaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. InkelaarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. State v. WARRIORSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API