Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Reece

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1966No. Civ. No. 577PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

Originally, the plaintiff filed an action to recover the balance claimed to be due from the defendants on a contract to drill a water well at their mining installation. On the first trial, the court granted judgment to the defendants on their counterclaim against the plaintiff and appellant on the basis of his failure to drill the well to a depth of 400 feet in accordance with his contract. Because of the breach by Mr. Kennedy, the court then awarded the defendants a balance of $1,307.15, but it was in error as to the details going to make up the judgment; this court, in Kennedy v. Reece, 225…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Valdez v. PercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Kennedy v. ReeceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Drummond v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Strauss v. KuninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Westbrooks v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Westbrooks v. Gordon H. Ball, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API