Legal Opinion

Boa v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Rys.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1920No. S. F. No. 8739PublishedCited by 44 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. L. Whittle, W. H. Smith, Louis W. Bennett, Morrison, Dunne & Brobeck and Chapman & Trefethen for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

The facts upon which this appeal is based are stated in the opinion of the district court of appeal for the first appellate district, division two, written by Mr. Justice Haven (28 Cal. App. Dec. 1005). We adopt that opinion, in part, as follows:

“Defendant appeals from a judgment, after verdict, in an action for damages resulting from personal injuries. The plaintiff and her daughter were passengers on a street railway car owned and operated by the defendant. They alighted from this car at the corner of University Avenue and Oxford Street, in the city of Berkeley, for the purpose of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Creamer v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Chicago City Railway Co. v. SaxbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Cody v. Market St. Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. BluhmIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API