Legal Opinion

Hirschfeld v. Hirschfeld

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 8, 1998No. AC 17144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ST ’TUVAN, J.

The defendant, T. Donald Hirschfeld, appeals from the trial court’s judgment ordering him to purchase the interest of the plaintiffs decedent in a partnership pursuant to a contract between the decedent and the defendant. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) enforced the contract in favor of the plaintiff and (2) concluded that only the defendant, rather than the other partners, was obligated to purchase the plaintiffs interest in the partnership. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The parties stipulated to the following facts at trial. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Lawson v. Whitey's Frame ShopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Pavliscak v. Bridgeport HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. SLI International Corp. v. CrystalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Southeastern Connecticut Regional Resources Recovery Authority v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. PintoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Przekopski v. PrzekopConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Hirschfeld v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API