Legal Opinion

Crawford & Lewis v. Boatmen's Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 7, 1999No. 98-1520PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellant Crawford & Lewis, a Louisiana law firm, appeals the order of the Pulaski County Chancery Court denying its petition for attorney’s fees and disgorging fees previously paid to it by the Mae M. Stacy Trust. For reversal, Crawford & Lewis argues that the chancellor abused her discretion by failing to award its requested fees and by disgorging fees previously paid. Appellee Boatmen’s Trust Company of Arkansas (Boatmen’s), has filed a cross-appeal on the issue of attorney’s fees to be awarded in defense of Crawford & Lewis’s petition. Boatmen’s also seeks…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Silbiger v. Prudence Bonds CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Griffin v. First Nat. Bank of CrossettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. South Beach Beverage Co. v. Harris Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Ross Explorations, Inc. v. Freedom Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Slusser v. FARM SERVICE, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Black v. DuffieCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API