Legal Opinion

Norman v. Norman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 14, 2002No. 01-734PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R AY THORNTON, Justice.

This action stems from an earlier appeal. Norman v. Norman, 334 Ark. 225, 970 S.W.2d 270 (1998) (Norman I). In that case, we were asked to determine whether C. Burt Newell, an attorney with Bachelor, Newell & Oliver, had a conflict of interest that would require him to disqualify from representing appellee, Josephine Norman, in an action seeking to enforce an alimony provision contained in a 1978 divorce decree dissolving the marriage between herself and appellant, Robert Norman. The alleged conflict of interest resulted from the fact that Latt Bachelor, a partner along…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Madden v. AldrichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Reynolds v. Guardianship of SearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Allen v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. HRR Arkansas, Inc. v. River City Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Alphin v. AlphinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Crawford County v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API