Legal Opinion
In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 6, 2005No. MDL Docket No. 1536; No. 03 C 4576PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL GAC CHEMICAL CO. TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN DISCOVERY REQUESTS
COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Throughout the range of the law, there are time limits imposed on litigants at every stage of the case: some are mandatory and admit of no deviations; others are more flexible. But in each instance, lawyers who do not pay heed to them do so at substantial peril to their and their clients’ interests. See, e.g., Brosted v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America, 421 F.3d 459 (7th Cir.2005). This is such a case. On July 1, 2005, the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1398, 35 fed.r.serv.3d 395 Miguel Angel Ayala-Gerena v. Bristol Myers-Squibb Company, D/B/A Bristol Myers-SquibbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Kim Patterson v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Hytera Commc'ns Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Richman v. SheahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Cunningham v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Haviland v. Catholic Health Initiatives-Iowa, Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.