Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Oildale Mutual Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1926No. Docket No. 3084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The defendant is a mutual water company. The plaintiff brought this action to obtain an injunction restraining the defendant from making excavations and laying water-pipes through certain parcels of land alleged to belong to plaintiff. In addition to denying many allegations, of the complaint, the answer alleges as a separate defense: “That on June 16, 1910, a map entitled ‘Map of Waits Subdivision’ was filed in the office of the county recorder of Kern County by plaintiff; that the property set forth in plaintiff’s amended complaint is particularly set forth and described in said map as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Venice v. Short Line Beach Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Lake v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. County of Inyo v. GivenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Porter v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Espinosa v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Richardson v. O'HanrahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. People v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Morgan v. NeffAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API