Legal Opinion

People v. Buck

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1941No. Crim. 467PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUNDO, J.,

pro tern. — Defendant was convicted of the crime of rape, and he appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial. He also appeals from an order made after judgment denying his motion to “amplify” the record on appeal. This latter motion was filed five days after the rendition of the judgment and by said motion defendant sought to have certain affidavits, attached to his motion, made a part of the record on appeal in support of his ground on appeal that his constitutional rights were invaded in that he was not accorded a public trial. In addition to these…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Baker v. JosephCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Arnold v. SkaggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. People v. PaysenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. UrquidasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. KobliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API