Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Board of Education of Sacramento City High School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1924No. Civ. No. 2642PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

On and prior to the eleventh day of September, 1922, the appellant was a teacher in the Sacramento high school. On said date the city superintendent of schools of the city of Sacramento presented to and filed with the city board of education of said city, then consisting of the persons named in the title hereof as defendants and respondents herein, written charges against the appellant as follows:

“That on the 1st day of September, 1922, at the High School before his class, in session and under discipline, he stated and remarked among some other notices as follows: “ ‘Many of you know Mr.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Ex parte McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. State ex rel. Spriggs v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Green v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Board of Education v. Dresden SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Board of Education v. Jack M.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Finot v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Uhl v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API