Legal Opinion
S. & S. Corrugated Paper Machinery Co. v. George W. Swift, Jr., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 5, 1949No. Nos. 9768, 9790PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
These are cross-appeals arising out of a patent controversy which had its beginnings in the Patent Office. The Board of Interference Examiners determined that as between Shields, who assigned to the plaintiff, S. & S. Corrugated Paper Machinery Co., Inc., and Morrison, who assigned to the defendant, George W. Swift, Jr., Inc., the latter was entitled to a patent on the mechanism involved on the ground that he was the prior inventor. Plaintiff then commenced this action in the district court pursuant to R.S. Section 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63,1 and the defendant filed a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Century Distilling Co. v. Continental Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Carborundum Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Smith v. Carter Carburetor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Radio Corporation of America and United States of America v. International Standard Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Radio Corporation of America v. Philco CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Sanford v. KepnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- A&H Sportswear Co. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Stamicarbon, N.V. v. Chemical Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.