Legal Opinion
Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Carborundum Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 3, 1946No. 8922, 8923PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The court below, at its No. 273, found that Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and Byron J. Oakes, were entitled to claims 1 to 6, inclusive, and claim 10 of Patent No. 2,111,006 issued March 15, 1938, to Norman P. Robie. At its No. 252 the court below found that Minnesota Mining and Oakes were entitled to claims 1 and 2 of Patent No. 2,111,272 issued March 15, 1938, to Paul M. Paulson. Minnesota Mining and Oakes were the plaintiffs in the two actions brought under R.S. Section 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to compel the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent embodying…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Gill v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Barrett Co. v. Koppers Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
- General Talking Pictures Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Jewell W. Vanderveer v. Erie Malleable Iron CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Methode Electronics, Inc. v. Elco Corporation and Benjamin FoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Nicholas L. Etten and Chamberlain Corporation v. Lovell Manufacturing Company and Walter L. Kauffman, 2dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.