Legal Opinion
Stamicarbon, N.V. v. Chemical Construction Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 21, 1976No. 75-2384PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
In this patent interference action, two parties claim priority with respect to a patentable refinement on a process for synthesizing urea, an industrial chemical compound. Appellant Chemical Construction *647Company (Chemico) is the assignee of a United States patent on a process for synthesizing urea issued in 1965 to Ivo Mavrovic (the Mavrovic patent). This patent was based on a United States application filed by Mavrovic in June of 1961. Appellee Stamicarbon N.V. is the assignee of a United States patent application on a urea synthesization process…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Radio Corporation of America and United States of America v. International Standard Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- In Re MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION INVOLVING FROST PATENT (Ten Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. Montedison, S.p.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Wm. T. Burnett & Co. v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
- Stamicarbon, N.V. v. The Chemical Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Standard Oil Company (Indiana) v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981