Legal Opinion

Bemis v. Guirl Drainage Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1914No. 22,543PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From Clay Circuit Court; John M. Rawley, Judge. Action by James Bemis against the Guiri Drainage Company and others to enjoin proceedings for drainage construction. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, C. J.

Appellant sued in the lower court to enjoin proceedings instituted under the act approved March 10, 1913 (Acts 1913 p. 433, §§8233b-8233el Burns 1914), to construct and maintain a system of drainage and reclamation of lands from floods, consisting of a levee, seven drains, and two flood gates. When the suit was brought the proceedings had reached a stage where the county commissioners had appointed appraisers as they were authorized to do by §13 (§8233n Burns 1914) of the act. The drainage company, the individual incorporators of it, the petitioners for the appointment of appraisers, the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. People v. . Adirondack Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Adirondack Railway Co. v. New York StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Harp v. Indiana Department of HighwaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Indianapolis v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. McKEE v. HASLERIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Book v. BOARD OF FLOOD CONTROL COMRS. ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Hagenback v. RandallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API