Legal Opinion

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Alabama

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 29, 1888No. 990PublishedCited by 159 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF ALABAMA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field

A statute of Alabama which took effect on the first of June, 1887, “for the protection of the travelling public against accidents caused by color blindness and defective vision,” declares that all persons afflicted with color blindness and loss of visual <• power to the extent therein defined are “disqualified from serving on railroad lines within the State in the capacity of locomotive engineer, fireman, train conductor, brakeman, station agent, switchman, flagman, gate fender, or signal man, or in any other position which requires the use or discrimination of form or color signals,” and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Lessee of Livingston v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API