Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1931No. Docket No. 2095PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J., pro tem.

Appellants, Smith and Hall, were jointly charged with having broken into two garages, stolen two automobiles and driven them without the consent of the owners. These accusations were embodied in six counts, two charging burglary, two grand theft and two alleging violations of section 146 of the California Vehicle Act. Appellant Smith was convicted on five counts, appellant Hall on three. Contrary to their contention, the evidence, we find, warranted the convictions.

Appellants’ guilt of the crimes of burglary and grand theft was established by evidence purely…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. DayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. BurdgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. People v. KimmerleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. PahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API