Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1932No. Docket No. 61PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, J., pro tem.

By an information filed in the superior court defendant and appellant Clarence King and one Edward L. Dobbs were charged jointly with the commission by them of the crime of grand theft, they being charged with stealing an automobile belonging to Katherine E. Smith; and by another information filed in said court defendant and appellant alone was charged with the commission by him of the crime of grand theft, he being charged with stealing an automobile belonging to Clark Blecka. The two eases were consolidated for trial. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. People v. SindiciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. People v. McGillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. CassandrasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. WissenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API