Legal Opinion

People v. Kimmerle

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1928No. Docket No. 1573PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant was charged in an information filed by the district attorney with two offenses, the first count alleging the crime of assault by means or force likely to produce great bodily injury, and the second count charging the offense of mayhem. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty of mayhem and found the defendant guilty of the offense first charged. This appeal is prosecuted by defendant from the judgment pronounced upon the verdict and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The first count details that the defendant “did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously and forcibly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. DayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. VanderbiltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. McIlvainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. People v. BumbaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. State v. WoodwardWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People v. OronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API