Legal Opinion

United States v. Young

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided August 16, 2013No. CR 12-4107-MWBPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENTENCING OPINION AND STATEMENT OF REASONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) DISCUSSING THE DRAMATIC NATIONAL DISPARITY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE’S APPLICATION OF 21 U.S.C. § 851 ENHANCEMENTS

MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION — DEFENDANT DOUGLAS YOUNG......................883

II. THE OVERVIEW...................................... LO CO 00

A. How The § 851 Enhancement Works................. lO 00 00

B. A Brief History Of Recidivist Enhancements And § 851 O 00 00

C. Lack Of A National DOJ § 851 Policy................ 00 00

D. The Wheel of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. Scott Allen NolandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. IngramCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. GullyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Merrell NealCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Michael Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. KupaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  4. United States v. FeautoDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015
  5. United States v. McLeanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API