United States v. McLean
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
McHugh, District Judge
The latitude given to federal authorities in charging drug offenses has been described as creating a “terrifying capacity for escalation of a defendant’s sentence.”1 This case exemplifies that reality, as a defendant caught by an undercover “sting” operation faces a Guideline sentence of 35 years to life imprisonment, with a mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years, because of a professed willingness to rob a drug stash house that was invented entirely by Government agents, containing a fictional amount of drugs chosen by those agents. At sentencing,…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Askia WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Tracy ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Daryle SellersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Askia WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Askia WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017