Legal Opinion
George v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 12, 1999PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
State Representative Camille “Bud” George (Petitioner) petitions for review of a Public Utility Commission (PUC) order providing final approval of a joint petition for full settlement to resolve issues raised by the restructuring plans of Metropolitan Edison Company (Met-Ed) and Pennsylvania Electric Company (Penelec) and the resulting litigation. Met-Ed and Penelec filed their restructuring plans with the PUC pursuant to the Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act (Competition Act), 66 Pa.C.S. §§ 2801-2812, to provide for the transition from monopoly-based…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- South Whitehall Township Police Service v. South Whitehall TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Ken R. on Behalf of CR v. ARTHUR Z.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Wilt v. BealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Yellow Cab Co. of Pittsburgh v. CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Arippa v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Lloyd v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- A. Funk O. Harrison, a minor, by his guardian A. Lee v. Tom Wolf, in his official capacity as Governor of Pennsylvania PA DEPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Unified Sportsmen v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.