Legal Opinion

Ken R. on Behalf of CR v. ARTHUR Z.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1996PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Ken R., on behalf of his daughter, C.R., appeals from the order of the Superior Court affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County which found that Appellant did not have standing to sue for visitation privileges with her half-sisters. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

C.R. is the daughter of Ken R. and Mary Jane Z. In 1981, Ken R. and Mary Jane Z. divorced, and Mary Jane Z. took custody of C.R. Subsequently, Mary Jane Z. married Arthur Z., and they had two daughters.

C.R. continued to live with Mary Jane Z., Arthur Z, and'…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Albright v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. FettersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. South Whitehall Township Police Service v. South Whitehall TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Franklin Tp. v. COM., DEPT. OF ENV. RESOURCESSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. In Re DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. T.B. v. L.R.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Mishoe v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Johnson v. American StandardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Independent Oil and Gas Association v. Board of AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API