Legal Opinion

People v. Shanklin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 23, 2004No. 4-01-0947PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE KNECHT

delivered the opinion of the court:

On September 21, 2001, defendant, Ronald Shanklin, filed a pro se petition for postconviction relief, alleging (1) he was unfit or incompetent when he entered his guilty plea and could not have understood the ramifications of the plea agreement; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to alert the trial court defendant was unfit for legal proceedings; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective for failure to cross-examine the victim at defendant’s sentencing hearing. On October 12, 2001, the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. GaultneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Melvin Newman v. Rick HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. People v. StephensAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. People v. TapscottAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. United States ex rel. Newman v. RednourDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API