Bank v. Bell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.
This appeal involves the decision of the question whether or not the city of Berkeley has the power to acquire, establish, maintain, own, and operate a municipal market. In this connection provisions of the constitution of California relative to municipal affairs, certain sections of Berkeley’s charter vital to its claims of “home rule,” and ordinances passed in conformity therewith, are to be considered and discussed and an opinion thereon given.
The city of Berkeley, through its council, on February 23, 1921, adopted Ordinance No. 699, N. S., establishing a market to be known and designated…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Pasadena v. CharlevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.