Legal Opinion

Young v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1966PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMMOND, J. (Pro Tempore).

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting a new trial after verdict and judgment was entered for plaintiff in the sum of $25,000. Defendants, by their brief, urge that the granting of a new trial was not error but that the trial court did err in refusing to grant their motion for a directed verdict.

Plaintiff brought this action for damages resulting from personal injuries he sustained when a vehicle belonging to the corporate defendant and driven by the defendant Larsen ran over a part of his body. The accident occurred when plaintiff stopped defendants’ vehicle as it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Burrows v. NashOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lyons v. BrowningOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Clark v. FAZIOOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Smith v. Industrial Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Maulding v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Friendship Auto Sales, Inc. v. Bank of Willamette ValleyOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Armstrong v. StegenOregon Supreme Court · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API