Legal Opinion

City of North Sacramento v. Irwin

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1928No. Docket No. 3688PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as city clerk, to countersign municipal bonds in the sum of $15,000, alleged to have been duly authorized by the voters of the petitioner at a special election.

The ordinance calling the election recites that “It is proposed to incur an indebtedness against the City of North Sacramento in the sum of $15,000 for the construction and completion of the outfall sewer pipe line over and across the American River.’’ Section 2 of the ordinance provides:

“The term of years the proposed bonds for said improvements are to run…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Skinner v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Barnum v. OkolonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Norton v. DyersburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Hollywood Union High School District v. KeyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. Town of GranadaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lawrence v. SchrofNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. Mann v. City of ArtesiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Oklahoma Utilities Co. v. City of HominySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API