City of North Sacramento v. Irwin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as city clerk, to countersign municipal bonds in the sum of $15,000, alleged to have been duly authorized by the voters of the petitioner at a special election.
The ordinance calling the election recites that “It is proposed to incur an indebtedness against the City of North Sacramento in the sum of $15,000 for the construction and completion of the outfall sewer pipe line over and across the American River.’’ Section 2 of the ordinance provides:
“The term of years the proposed bonds for said improvements are to run…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skinner v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Barnum v. OkolonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Norton v. DyersburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hollywood Union High School District v. KeyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- National Bank of Commerce v. Town of GranadaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Lawrence v. SchrofNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Mann v. City of ArtesiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Oklahoma Utilities Co. v. City of HominySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.