Legal Opinion

Hollywood Union High School District v. Keyes

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1909No. Civ. No. 777PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of mandate to the county clerk of Los Angeles County, and ex officio■ clerk of its board of supervisors. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The petition discloses that the trustees of the Hollywood Union High School District heretofore, acting under section 1745 of the Political Code as enacted in 1909 (Stats. 1909, pp. 488, 489), gave notice to the taxpayers of the time and place for an election at which was to be determined the question of the issuance of bonds for purposes within the statute. This notice, it is conceded, contained all of the matters required by the section above stated, excepting that, in respect of interest, the notice provided that the bonds, which should be of the denomination of $1,000 each,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Koehring ex rel. Martin v. MuemminghoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Murphy v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ramsdell v. HulettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Tanner v. Dundee Land Investment Co.United States Circuit Court · 1882
  5. Murphy v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cole v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Baird v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Cate v. StapletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. City of North Sacramento v. IrwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Estate of SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API