Eells v. Rosenblum
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
This action for malicious prosecution, abuse of process and intentional infliction of emotional distress had its genesis more than 15 years ago. It is the fourth in a series of related lawsuits. Appellant Thomas M. Bells appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered upon the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend in favor of respondents Seymour Rosenblum, Crest Auto Insurance Brokers and Attorney Larry E. Wasserman. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude the underlying lawsuit was not favorably terminated on the merits. In the unpublished portion of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Susag v. City of Lake ForestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Robbins v. BlecherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Marsh v. San Diego CountyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
- Padres L.P. v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Ross v. KishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.