Legal Opinion
Robbins v. Blecher
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1997No. B099197PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
In this malicious prosecution action, plaintiffs and appellants Howard J. Robbins and the Howard J. Robbins Family Trust of 1989 (collectively Robbins) appeal from a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of demurrers in favor of defendants and respondents James Sessions and Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. (collectively Sessions) and Sessions’s counsel, Blecher & Collins, Maxwell M. Blecher and Donald R. Pepperman (collectively Attorneys). Sessions brought an alter ego action against Robbins to enforce a judgment it had obtained against Robbins’s corporation. When the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Communist Party of the United States of Amerika v. 522 Valencia, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Stanley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Toho-Towa Co. v. Morgan Creek Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Marsh v. San Diego CountyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.