Legal Opinion
Danaho Refining Co. v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 22, 1964No. 4275PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Justice.
Danaho Refining Company appeals from a take-nothing judgment on an instructed verdict in its action against appellees in which Danaho sought $5,000,000 actual and exemplary damages arising out of alleged violations of the Texas anti-trust laws, Arts. 7426-7447, and of Art. 6008b, Vernon’s Ann. Tex. St., and an alleged common law conspiracy. We affirm.
Danaho sued some 20 individual and corporate owners of the Burnell-North Pettus recycling plant and Triangle Refineries, Inc., alleging that these appellees and others, by their method of operating the plant and the marketing of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Galveston Tribune v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Wilderspin v. Bewley Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Carter v. LindemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Da Moth & Rose v. Hillsboro Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Chuppe v. GULF IRON WORKS, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- DeLeon v. Louder, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987
- Brown v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Brown v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Scurlock Oil Co. v. SmithwickTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Scurlock Oil Co. v. SmithwickTexas Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.