Legal Opinion

DeLeon v. Louder

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided December 31, 1987No. 07-87-0007-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Andres DeLeon and Rachel DeLeon, individually and as next friend of their child, Dana DeLeon, sought to recover damages from David Louder as the result of a collision between an automobile driven by Louder and one driven by Rachel DeLeon. Accepting jury findings that negligence on the part of both Louder and Rachel DeLeon caused the collision, and that fault was attributable 15% to Louder and 85% to Rachel DeLeon, the court rendered a take-nothing judgment.

This appeal by the DeLeons requires us to determine, conformable to their points of error, whether the trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. American StatesmanTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Phoenix Refining Co. v. TipsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Condra Funeral Home v. RollinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Carr v. RadkeyTexas Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. LaBruttoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Tate, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  3. Trailways, Inc. v. Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  4. Gregg County Appraisal District v. Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995
  5. Louder v. De LeonTexas Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API