Legal Opinion
Holly v. Housing Authority of New Orleans
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided May 4, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-5593PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
In May of 1984, the plaintiff, LaTanya Holly, rented an apartment at 512 Austerlitz Street in New Orleans. The owner of the rental property, Clarence Bell, entered into a one-year lease with Holly and, also, a housing assistance payments contract with the Housing Authority of New Orleans (“HANO”). The assistance contract was authorized under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act, which provides for direct subvention payments to private lessors on behalf of qualified low-income lessees. 1 42 U.S.C. § 1437f. The Department of Housing and Urban…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Patricia D. Deubert and Sonya M. Deroche v. Gulf Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stacey Clark v. Archibald Alexander, Acting Executive Director, Alexandria Redevelopment and Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Hurt v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Ellis v. RitchieDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- McField ex rel. Ray v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Cain v. Allegheny County Housing AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.