Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Philadelphia Housing Authority

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-4746PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GILES, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are past and/or present residents of housing units owned and/or managed by the Philadelphia Housing Authority (“PHA”). Plaintiffs have filed a class action suit against PHA, other local, state, and federal government instrumentalities and officials, lead-pigment manufacturers, and those manufacturers’ trade association. Plaintiffs advance a plethora of claims against defendants based upon injuries allegedly sustained as a result of exposure to' lead-based paint applied to their PHA housing units. 1 Plaintiffs seek both compensatory and injunctive…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Sun Co. v. Badger Design & Constructors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. National Leased Housing Association, and 189 Named v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API