Legal Opinion

Stacey Clark v. Archibald Alexander, Acting Executive Director, Alexandria Redevelopment and Housing Authority

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1996No. 95-1280PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge CLARKE wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Senior Judge CHAPMAN joined.

OPINION

CLARKE, Senior District Judge:

This appeal concerns the standard of review applicable in federal civil rights cases challenging the decisions of local housing authorities implementing the federal low-income housing assistance program. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1401-40. In Ritter v. Cecil County Office of Hous. & Community Dev., this Court held that interpretive rules adopted by local housing authorities should be afforded deference by federal courts “only to the extent the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. GTE South, Inc. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. DeCambre v. Brookline Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  3. Costa v. Fall River Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Sierra Club v. State Water Control BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  5. Shabazz v. Pya Monarch, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API